Title |
-
en
Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following tongue and hard palate stimulation on the preferred chewing side.
|
Creator |
|
Accessrights |
open access |
Rights |
-
en
© 2014. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
-
en
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
Subject |
-
Other
en
magnetoencephalography
-
Other
en
mastication
-
Other
en
preferred chewing side
-
Other
en
primary somatosensory cortex
-
Other
en
somatosensory evoked fields
-
Other
en
somatosensory evoked potentials
-
Other
en
trigeminal nerve
-
MeSH
en
Adult
-
MeSH
en
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology
-
MeSH
en
Female
-
MeSH
en
Functional Laterality/physiology
-
MeSH
en
Humans
-
MeSH
en
Magnetoencephalography
-
MeSH
en
Male
-
MeSH
en
Mastication/physiology
-
MeSH
en
Palate, Hard/physiology
-
MeSH
en
Somatosensory Cortex/physiology
-
MeSH
en
Tongue/physiology
-
MeSH
en
Trigeminal Nerve/physiology
-
NDC
497
|
Description |
-
Abstract
en
Although oral sensory feedback is essential for mastication, whether the cortical activity elicited by oral stimulation is associated with the preferred chewing side (PCS) is unclear. Somatosensory evoked fields were measured in 12 healthy volunteers (6 with the right side as the PCS and 6 with the left side as the PCS) following tongue and hard palate stimulation. Three components were identified over the contralateral (P40m, P60m, and P80m) and ipsilateral [P40m(I), P60m(I), and P80m(I)] hemispheres. Since no component was consistently detected across subjects, we evaluated the cortical activity over each hemisphere using the activated root-mean-square (aRMS), which was the mean amplitude of the 18-channel RMS between 10 and 150ms. For tongue stimulation, the aRMS for each hemisphere was 8.23 ± 1.55 (contralateral, mean ± SEM) and 4.67 ± 0.88 (ipsilateral)fT/cm for the PCS, and 5.11 ± 1.10 (contralateral) and 4.03 ± 0.82 (ipsilateral)fT/cm for the non-PCS. For palate stimulation, the aRMS was 5.35 ± 0.58 (contralateral) and 4.62 ± 0.67 (ipsilateral)fT/cm for the PCS, and 4.63 ± 0.56 (contralateral) and 4.14 ± 0.60 (ipsilateral)fT/cm for the non-PCS. For hard palate stimulation, the aRMS did not differ between the PCS and non-PCS, whereas for tongue stimulation, the contralateral hemisphere aRMS was significantly greater for the PCS than for the non-PCS. Thus, our results show that lateralized cortical activation was associated with the PCS for tongue, but not hard palate, stimulation; a potential reason for this may be the different sensory-inputs between these two areas, specifically the presence or absence of fine motor function.
|
Publisher |
en
Elsevier
|
Date |
|
Language |
|
Resource Type |
journal article |
Version Type |
AM |
Identifier |
HDL
http://hdl.handle.net/2115/60460
|
Relation |
-
isVersionOf
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2014.10.025
-
PMID
25455302
|
Journal |
-
-
PISSN
0022-510X
-
EISSN
1878-5883
-
NCID
AA00703265
-
en
Journal of the neurological sciences
-
Volume Number347
Issue Number1-2
Page Start288
Page End294
|
File |
|
Oaidate |
2023-07-26 |