Back

Title
  • en A Comparison of Tobacco Policy in the UK and Japan : If the Scientific Evidence is Identical, Why is There a Major Difference in Policy?
Creator
    • en Cairney, Paul
Accessrights open access
Rights
  • en This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of comparative policy analysis on 2017-5-16, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13876988.2017.1323439
Subject
  • Other en comparative policy
  • Other en UK
  • Other en Japan
  • Other en tobacco control
  • Other en policy environments
  • Other en multiple streams approach
  • Other en evidence-based policy making
  • NDC 300
Description
  • Abstract en Tobacco policy in the UK and Japan has diverged markedly. In the 1980s, both countries oversaw regimes with minimal economic and regulatory policies. Now the UK has become one of the most, and Japan one of the least, controlled (advanced industrial) states. These developments are puzzling to public health scholars who give primary explanatory weight to scientific evidence and a vague notion of political will, because policy makers possessed the same evidence on the harms of tobacco, and made the same international commitment to comprehensive tobacco control. Instead, we identify the role of a mutually reinforcing dynamic in policy environments, facilitating policy change in the UK but not Japan: policy makers accepted the scientific evidence, framed tobacco as a public health epidemic, placed health departments at the heart of policy, formed networks with public health groups and excluded tobacco companies, and accentuated socio-economic conditions supportive of tobacco control. This dynamic helps explain why the UK became more likely to select each tobacco policy control instrument during a series of windows of opportunity. Such analysis, generated by policy theory, is crucial to contemporary science/practitioner debates on the politics of evidence-based policy making: the evidence does not speak for itself, and practitioners need to know how to use it effectively in policy environments.
Publisher en Taylor & Francis
Date
    Issued2018-11-16
Language
  • eng
Resource Type journal article
Version Type AM
Identifier HDL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/71983
Relation
  • isVersionOf DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1323439
Journal
    • PISSN 1387-6988
      • en Journal of comparative policy analysis
      • Volume Number20 Issue Number3 Page Start253 Page End268
File
Oaidate 2023-07-26