Subsequent Jumping Increases the Knee and Hip Abduction Moment, Trunk Lateral Tilt, and Trunk Rotation Motion During Single-Leg Landing in Female Individuals

Chijimatsu Masato; Ishida Tomoya; Yamanaka Masanori; Taniguchi Shohei; Ueno Ryo; Ikuta Ryohei; Samukawa Mina; Ino Takumi; Kasahara Satoshi; Tohyama Harukazu

Title	en Subsequent Jumping Increases the Knee and Hip Abduction Moment, Trunk Lateral Tilt, and Trunk Rotation Motion During Single-Leg Landing in Female Individuals
Creator	en Chijimatsu, Masato en Ishida, Tomoya NRID 1000030759642 en Yamanaka, Masanori NRID 1000040166757 en Taniguchi, Shohei en Ueno, Ryo en Ikuta, Ryohei en Samukawa, Mina NRID 1000040360953 en Ino, Takumi NRID 1000070736339 en Kasahara, Satoshi NRID 1000010312422 en Tohyama, Harukazu NRID 1000060301884
Accessrights	open access
Rights	en Accepted author manuscript version reprinted, by permission, from Journal of applied biomechanics, 2023, 39(4): 223–229, https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2022-0305. © Human Kinetics, Inc.
Subject	Other en anterior cruciate ligament Other en risk factor Other en injury prevention Other en core Other en unilateral landing NDC 490
Description	Abstract en Single-leg landings with or without subsequent jumping are frequently used to evaluate landing biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of subsequent jumping on the external knee abduction moment and trunk and hip biomechanics during single-leg landing. Thirty young adult female participants performed a single-leg drop vertical jumping (SDVJ; landing with subsequent jumping) and single-leg drop landing (SDL; landing without subsequent jumping). Trunk, hip, and knee biomechanics were evaluated using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system. The peak knee abduction moment was significantly larger during SDVJ than during SDL (SDVJ 0.08 [0.10] N·m·kg−1·m−1, SDL 0.05 [0.10] N·m·kg−1·m−1, P = .002). The trunk lateral tilt and rotation angles toward the support-leg side and external hip abduction moment were significantly larger during SDVJ than during SDL (P < .05). The difference in the peak hip abduction moment between SDVJ and SDL predicted the difference in the peak knee abduction moment (P = .003, R 2 = .252). Landing tasks with subsequent jumping would have advantages for evaluating trunk and hip control as well as knee abduction moment. In particular, evaluating hip abduction moment may be important because of its association with the knee abduction moment.
Date	Issued2023-05-24
Language	eng
Resource Type	journal article
Version Type	AM
Identifier	HDL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/89339
Relation	isVersionOf DOI https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2022-0305 PMID 37225171
Journal	PISSN 1065-8483 EISSN 1543-2688 en Journal of Applied Biomechanics Volume Number39 Issue Number4 Page Start223 Page End229
File	fulltext Ishida2023.pdf 635.95 KB (application/pdf) Issued2023-05-24
Oaidate	2024-10-19